| 翻訳と辞書 |
| J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B. ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B.
''J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.'', 511 U.S. 127 (1994), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that making peremptory challenges based solely on a prospective juror's sex is unconstitutional. ''J.E.B.'' extended the court's existing precedent in ''Batson v. Kentucky'' (1986), which found race-based peremptory challenges in criminal trials unconstitutional, and ''Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Company'' (1991), which extended that principle to civil trials. As in ''Batson'', the court found that sex-based challenges violate the Equal Protection Clause.
== Background ==
On behalf of T.B., the mother of a minor child, the state sued J.E.B. for child support in Jackson County, Alabama. During jury selection, challenges intentionally targeted male potential jurors resulting in an all-female jury.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B.」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|